Skip to content
Tinnitus Clarified

Who writes this site

219 articles, every one listing the named sources it draws on. Here is who produces them and what that byline does — and does not — mean.

Last changed

Research and editorial

Tinnitus Clarified Team

Tinnitus Clarified is published under a shared byline rather than by a single named specialist. Every article lists the named, checkable sources its claims draw on — peer-reviewed studies, clinical guidelines and recognised health bodies among them — so that a statement can be checked against the evidence behind it rather than taken on the authority of a byline. The site does not provide medical care and has no commercial relationship with any treatment, device or supplement it discusses.

219 articles · 4 topic areas · every article listing its named sources

Why there is no single named expert

A named specialist on the byline is a trust signal, and an easy one to fake. Rather than invent one, this site takes a different approach: every article lists the named sources its claims draw on, and the checks run against those sources are published with their dates, so the authority sits with the research rather than with us.

That is a deliberate trade. It means you should read this site as a well-sourced guide to the evidence, not as clinical advice from a specialist who has assessed you — because it is not that, and no amount of confident presentation would make it so.

Medical reviewers

There are none, and no article claims otherwise. The credit system is built and unused.

Full reasoning, and the standard any reviewer would be held to, is on the medical review policy page.

Are you an audiologist or ENT?

This site would like its articles read by people qualified to catch what a source check cannot. If you hold a current clinical qualification in audiology, otolaryngology or a related specialty, this is what a review would involve.

  • One article at a time. You read it against the sources it cites, and flag anything overstated, outdated or unsafe. Nothing is changed in your name without your agreement.
  • What is published. Your name, a link where your credential can be verified independently, the date of your review, and a sentence saying what it covered — on the article, and on this site’s contributors page.
  • Interests declared. Any commercial interest in a treatment, device or company the article discusses is stated beside your name.
  • A review covers the version you read. When the article is later substantively revised, the page stops presenting it as reviewed, or says plainly that it has changed since, until you have read the new version.

Email ask@tinnitusclarified.com with the subject “Clinical review”, and say which articles fall within your practice.

How to check our work